Martin Luther King Jr’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail” Essay

Martin Luther King Juniors letter from Birmingham Jail was the reflectance upon protest against un well(p) constabularys was established against him and his fellow men. Throughout his letter he uses many great philosophers and historical events to justify his own protest to be necessary to do whats right. King was the leader of civil-rights group that back up protest against traditional views of the participation and unjust laws established in the era. In any nonviolent campaign on that point are four base steps collection of the facts to baffle whether injustices exist negotiation self purgation and direct action. ( Taylor)In his letter from Birmingham Jail King states It was illegal to sanction and comfort a Jew in Hitlers Germany. Even so, I am sure that, had I lived in Germany at that time, I would have back up and comforted my Jewish brothers. If today I lived in a communistic country where certain principles dear to the Christian faith are suppressed, I would openly advocate disobeying that countrys anti-religious laws (King, 6). Here in this unpack shows that King encourages protest because in some extreme circumstances becomes necessary, be it in Hitlers Germany, a Communist country, or any business office in which injustices are occurring. In the end of the sentence King openly admits that he would protest against established laws or traditions by all federal agency necessary because they favor the unjust.The letter was written to his fellow clergymen to explain his earlier actions and to attempt justified and appropriate for the situation. He expressed that he weak every other option to justify them. In the letter he tried to explain to the clergy that his actions although illegal were possible and direct action was the but available option left, which could make a difference.One may hearty ask How can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying others? The answer lies in the fact that there are two types of laws just and unjust. One has not that a legal but a moral responsibleness to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. I would curb with St. Augustine that an unjust law is no law at all. Now, what is the difference between the two? How does one determine whether a law is just or unjust? (King, 5). Throughout history, there have been many unjust laws.Many state follow laws just because they are laws. Sometimes people dont even agree with a law, but they go along because its in society acceptable or because its just the law. I think that by writing the letter, and putting forward the definition, King is challenging his readers to consider whether or not a law is just. If a law is unjust, it is the responsibility of the people to get it overturned. A society should not live with an unjust law. By choosing to go against law it shows that king primarily a teleological thinker.In conclusion, King wrote Letter from Birmingham City Jail for the purpose of making his h earing realize that they are not carrying out our Constitution and the Declaration of liberty which is the unify States was founded upon. King only wants what should be granted to all United States citizens, this being freedom, justice, and equality. He is saying he is in jail for only doing what is right, by trying to achieve what is right through non-violence and the fact that he is in jail is unjust, does not support equality, and freedom.Work CitedTaylor, Justin. Between cardinal Worlds. Martin-luther-king-jr-letter-from-birmingham-jail http//thegospelcoalition.org/. 23 Jan. 2013.