Thursday, February 14, 2019
Wikipedia :: Persuasive, Valid or Unreliable Source
AWikipedia is an discipline source for many students (Coughlan, 2011), used for research on some every subject. Some people call it frequently unreliable plot of ground some others name it to be the epitome of the schooling age (Andrews 2007) yet the uprightness is that, whether students and teachers, like to admit it or not, Wikipedia is a vast source of knowledge, with discernability second to none (Coughlan, 2011). However because of its wide usage and the fact that it is a wiki, it can be edited by anyone, schools are often averse to accept it as a valid source of teaching for essays or school work and some take it to the extreme 14% of schools hitch Wikipedia (Fleming 2011). The biggest problems with validating said source is the fact that its reliability is questioned, as thither is no one single entity responsible for and accountable for the instruction, as conflicting to a peer-reviewed journal. This lack of authority, according to a group of academics, and seve ral(predicate) agendas allow the general public to alter information (Waldman2004) that validates itself through the information loop. This information loop consist of the following A Wikipedia article contains information A. A journalist then uses this unverified information in an article. A critical reader then adds a Citation needed on the original information after which someone adds the article as a source. (Wikipedia, date unknown) Another problem that Wikipedia faces is the fact that if mistakes are not caught on the day they were made, they are likely to go unnoticed.On the other hand, Wikipedia differentiates itself from other encyclopaedias in that most articles are longer and contain more information both technically and historically speaking. (Wetzel 2008) Furthermore, most articles contain links or citation that link to articles or proof of almost every parameter made. The problem that arises is then, that blocking Wikipedia denies students from valid, thorough informa tion yet shields them from its inherent undependableness (Fleming, 2011)B Fig1. Standard Wikipedia articleAs fig.1 shows, summons in Wikipedia include a search bar, links to some useful links ( such as stochastic articles, current events and donate). To the right, depending on the article, it will show links to other information relating to the current article, this appears if the article is part of a bigger series such as the I.B or Nazism. Articles will also include the edit this page button and many footnotes that provide evidence or citation for phrases or quotes.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment