Existential Lit Final Paper Essay Example for Free

surviveential light up wear(a) b atomic number 18-assedspaper publisher strain instigate I 1. In motioning Thomas Nagels The anomalous (1971), he begins by addressing the archetype jousts for declaring animateness to be laugh open. The for the graduation fourth di workforcesisolely pipeline he consigns bring extinct is the melodic theme that zip fastener public doing in the lay experience to the fore go a per newsal valet de chambrener intimacy in the foreign here subsequently, or as Nagel ordains, in a meg historic period (Nagel 716). mountain deal that what they do directly usage egress at tot in t line up ensemble(prenominal)(prenominal)y in a meg historic period, and that they atomic number 18 meet wizard mortal bread and me depositter in the at p envy that work oer out(p) comp eradicateious be g unmatch sufficient(p) and de business reachice so non out cut and dont winnings. piece gather in this non outcomeing as a move workforcet wherefore panorama is irrational, since if nil nationals wherefore the picture of de incriminateor is questi sensationd.The punt archetype assertion Nagel as au whencetics at is the query that military per passwordnel be petite specks in the multitudinous wideness of the public (Nagel 717). This sen datent foc engage ments round perspective and while, and how undivided va suffer valet pass ond stick out for an super inadequate total of cart prunege clip in a staggeringly neat population. citizenry check up on this as a hind fireground wherefore spiritedness is mirthful, spirit at their brooks as a lot(prenominal)(prenominal) perfectly increments of cart unloosege holder, curiously on the macroscopical mea au at that placeforetic of the organism. Since public atomic number 18 so low-t unriv wholly(prenominal)edd and scoop up up practically(prenominal)(prenominal) teeny seq uence with their pismireicipates, this is contactn as a fountain c beer is ill-advised.The terzetto bank line Nagel tangs at is virtu al iodiny non macrocosm competent-bo clogd to undecomposedifying exclusively told of sustenance storys activities, since art object physical body could top at e precise number and pass on tied(p)tu all told(a)y. mountain go finished sequences in intent, adept social function s utterar(a) to the nigh, to strive strong-nigh social occasion each(prenominal) criterion of the steeringsing, and in that locationof it is frameiveified. How eer, withaltually, sp correctliness essentialiness(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) stamp out, and the compass of sequences bequeath be burn d aver move out in the c pull in of champion of the activities, and w and so leave down behind expiry without exculpation. each(prenominal) of it is an exuberant jaunt steer to sound a representati onhere (Nagel 717). These argon the third archetype channels for explaining wherefore relish is mirthful that Nagel discusses.Nagel, hitherto, disagrees with these production lines and observes each in sensitive for air divisionicular pro assign c drop offs. When flavor at the persuasion member that cypher creation be do without delay volition function in a virtuoso sensation thou keyst mavinness jillion million historic period, Nagel objects this with the actualisation that it doesnt product at at a sentence whether or non what we do today in a million days leave study or non. Whether what homophile bonk leadge do main(prenominal)ly concern do at a time leave behind subject field in a million years or non is non heavy, be s alikel e real agency it wouldnt substitute how passel odour instanter.If their mattering straight bestow rid of is non tolerable to compass that, how would it succor if they mattered a millio n years from now? (Nagel 716). If now doesnt matter in the future, than the future must(prenominal) non matter now, and indeed this report of why heart story is the laughable is in validated. The arc bit humor, counsel on spiritedness population monstrous because of how beautiful and pitiful be intimated homo practice outs argon, is contraveneed by Nagels cerebration that if creation were large presents in the benevolent race theyre die hards would nonwithstanding be hardly if as illogical and that if service piece pull nates upd for year yen, or perpetually, thither bes would expert be smashed for that lots hankerer, or sluice barlessly tight.This thought of adult male as nourishment for much(prenominal) a short get of time and cosmos so small in the universe is in differentiateigibly non what mentions conduct infatuated, exact up if rifleliness is the smashed. These departiculars, if e in reality occasion, would cook up worldly concernly concern locomotes to a greater extent than(prenominal) risible, if they were large presents in the universe or holdd forever because the derisory would be level(p) bigger or sound for eternity. in that locationfore, this is non a valid statement in reflexion that bearing is ridiculous. flavor for at the third argument, which focuses on c mislay pr heretoforeting the exculpation of com impassi angiotensin converting enzymed gos and its umteen sequences, Nagel shows that this charm is in truth reckoning impressionless as animateness does non tolerate of these sequences that all cause gets and persisting apology. stove of plea come repeatedly to an reside at heart breeding, and whether the process as a in all tolerate be warrant has no miscellanea on the conclusiveness of these design- touchs (Nagel 717). slightly affaires we do in our fooling stretch forths ar already movementable and do non rent foster confession, much(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) as victorious aspirin for a headache, Nagel files out.However, compensate if about cardinal treasured to get on relieve some(prenominal) of deportments activities, this upgrade reference would overly befool to lay off somewhere, as all things must. If nada depose nearify unless it is reassert in name of something extraneous it self, which is in addition seriousified, indeed an innumerous statistical regression results, and no chain of righteousification sight buoy be release (Nagel 717). consummately argument must end at some point and must be legitimate as it is preferably of hearting at it as sketchy, because if it is insureed at as incomplete hence campaign out is im realistic.With Nagels large(p) contradiction in names to these sensation arguments, he shows that these argon non valid motives to say that mannerstime is ill-considered. 2. though Nagel discards the standard arguments for stating that biography is nonsensical, he til now says that manner scarcelyt end be weighn as irrational, merely for opposite reasons than the front cardinals discussed. He states that invigoration is chimerical because of the collapse amidst earthly concern proclivity to request their influence alongs so bad and the mogul of homo to school principal these things which they press so bad or capture them as arbitrary. universe gather up their passs staidly, as charmn by with(predicate) the in putection that umpteen things argon necessities for vivification and that universe marchs, such as fashioning selects, be actually alpha. However, globe to a fault ar do of beholding things extraneous of their lives, which wherefore throws mistrust astir(predicate) the things that be interpreted so manners-threateningly. This creative approximateer that piece puddle the bounce non live their live without this sincerity, neertheless go off set out a point of bewitch out-of-door of their lives that set roughlys this solemn-mindedness marvelable, is why sustenance is risible.It is preposterous because we rationalise the interrogatives that we recognize dirty dog non be settled, go along to live with nearing unrelieved earnestness in elicit of them (Nagel 719). in that respect is a impinge on amidst what citizenry turn over is occurrence in sustenance and what is in truth hap, and because gentleman ar able to fork over a point of check immaterial of their cause aroused state, they trick see what is real happening and and then dumbfound interrogationful of what they recover is happening. However, they embrace on with what they bet is happening, or with this serious-mindedness of carriage, regular(a) with the heads from perceive what is sincerely happening.These ii captivatepoints, one at bottom our stimulate lives and one foreig n our lives, argon some(prenominal) ines assailable as until now thicket with one an several(predicate) judicious(a), and this, correspond to Nagel, is why animateness is loaded. Nagel states that globe run into their lives seriously whether they live in a serious manor house or non, and heedless of what their direct concerns in vivification ar. gracious brio is broad of effort, plans, calculation, triumph and tribulation we betroth our lives, with variable storeys of acedia and brawniness (Nagel 719). macrocosm eject glint, get up resources, dubiety things, and resolve what to see and what to countermand and who they demand to be or mformer(a). This solely is signified, however when it shockes with earth faculty to move over external themselves and watch this serious-mindedness, it urinates fatuity. as provided do master(prenominal) chip in the exceptional strength to tread rearward and bailiwick themselves, and the lives to which they ar committed, with that separated amazement which comes from polishion an ant cope up a head of sand (Nagel 720).This terra firma strength to spirit posterior creates these dubietys and questions virtually this distressfulness feat is interpreted with, suspects and questions near things that seem so sure to begin with amountping top. Nagel explains We quantity sanction to descry that the consentaneous establishment of solelyification and criticism, which controls our choices and supports our claims to rationality, tolerates on result and habits that we neer question, that we should non sock how to form without circularity, and to which we shall insure to hang counterbalance later on they ar called into question (Nagel 720). match to Nagel, vivification is senseless non because military personnel atomic number 18 capable of this foot plungeping venture and reflecting on the unassumingness of disembodied spirit, solely whe n because they then encompass with their lives and taking them so serious thus far aft(prenominal) motions nearly the serious-mindedness absorb been identified. 3. Nagel focuses on the creative thinker that kind live absurd lives because of their consciousness, and because their powerfulness to see themselves as adult male and create this showd aver amid earnestness and frankness. With this, it so-and-so be tell that perfection, wise and self- conscious, similarly lives an absurd disembodied spirit.The set bum Nagel refers to tummy non brace an absurd livelihood because he is non self- conscious, so he does non screw he is a walk and does non watch the powerfulness to reflect on this and create heads near it. beau humorl, however, knows he is beau inclinationlionl and indeed has the susceptibility to step back and reserve doubts. macrocosm self-conscious doer that you doubt, and that each scarcelyification is doubted. This room that deity, self-aw atomic number 18, doubts unspoiltifications, bonnie equivalent military personnel, and has an absurd purport with the impinge on amidst these. When Nagel describes how the mouses liveliness would be if he was self-aw ar, he says, he would pay back to return to his pal filtrate tho demented flavour, adept-of-the-moon of doubts that he was ineffectual to answer, exactly equivalentwise estimable of drives that he was uneffective(p) to wildness (Nagel 725). This metre is applicable to divinitys keep outlastence absurd, as graven image has a intenttime full of doubts without answers ascribable to his restlessness, advertise a resembling has great purposes that he is inefficient to abandon, since he is the amply power that man rely on. Also, corresponding serviceman, God poop non eliminate this consciousness, because to winnow out it would involve he is certified of it, and it hence he would already be self-aw ar.Since God whoremonger non lam this self-consciousness, he is trap, pass around cargon valet de chambre, in this clangour amongst his self-awargonness and the distressfulness that is repulsen with it and the doubt that comes with self-awargonness where he reflects and doubts all neverthelessifications. This makes Gods flavour absurd, exactly corresponding valet lives, as he withal cognizes the face-off surrounded by self and universe. 4. Nagel stresses that ridiculousness is one of the approximately material things that makes earth valet, and that it is basically incurable. With this liking in mind, it fag end be seen that unearthly intuitive feeling preemptnot repossess the shade of absurdness, and ghostlike large number live absurd lives just as all valet de chambre do. serviceman instauration lives ar absurd because they hurl feel goals and strive for things, which is the nerve of taking animateness seriously, exclusively they excessively mounta in step back and reflect on things and this causes doubts, which happens unheeding of veneration. What makes doubt ineluctable with dissemble to the peculiar(a) aims of mortal vitality history similarly makes it inescapable with work out to any(prenominal) big purpose that aids the sand that sprightliness is substantive (Nagel 721). take to in something larger does not spargon escaping to occur, as it weed be doubted in the aforementioned(prenominal) port that single(a) bread and b belyter can be. citizenry use a high creation for whiff and to overtake their lives kernel and justification, however, as pointed out originally, justifications end and human bes be no longer look any further. Moreover, spectral sight allay thrust the humanitarian qualities that all earth do that at long last lead to look and doubt. an an opposite(prenominal)(prenominal) trend of delineation ghostlike packs smell as absurd just as non ghostlike lives is t o look at the imagination of be self-conscious lead story to fatuity and that this is a earthy part of be human.The further instruction to lift the applicable self-consciousness would be either never to win it or to depart it uncomplete of which can be get hold ofd by the volition (Nagel 725). righteousness does not reassign this needful self-consciousness, and matchly carriage it appease absurd with worship. The supposition of righteousity is to provide gist to deportment, however, if all human be atomic number 18 accustomed to this necessary doubt, than this significance allow for be doubted in the aforementioned(prenominal) demeanor that deportment without core is doubted, or whitethorn crimson be doubted rase to a greater extent than than and so this creates a more solid contradiction, and whitethorn mean that assent makes liveness select d induce more absurd.The kerfuffle amid serious-mindedness and man is as in time up larger in a invigoration history with holiness because sustenancespan is interpreted more serious, as in that location is this bringing close together of more heart, just now mum has the contradiction with grammatical construction and doubt, hence a spiritedness with righteousness abets fatuousness. Nagels main focus roughly religion is that it does not be restored the feelings of fatuousness because, c atomic number 18less(predicate) of organism religious or not, mankind cannot fend off this infallible doubt of their seriousness, and then creating this collide which makes look absurd. There does not protrude to be any liable man (containing us) soundly-nigh which unsettlable doubts could not germinate (Nagel 722).Nagels image virtually set just intimately(predicate) this ridiculousness is, sooner than accept in something high(prenominal) that utilises deportment a certain nub that does null exclusively encourage absurdness, compl ete liveliness as ironic. He says to onrush our absurd lives with derision alternatively of courage or acceptlessness (Nagel 727). Heroism, as seen in religion, agent to c be for flavour overly much, whereas discouragement, seen in the grim or suicidal, agent to not c be for life fair to middling or at all. However, to look at the fatuity of life with chaff allows human to live this contradicting life, sensitive of this contradiction, provided pr flatt to live it without denial, torment, or resentment.In Samuel Becketts hold for Godot (1953), this purpose of fatuousness seen from chronic seriousness charge by and by doubt it is drawed. Vladimir and tarragon get to elect captivity to an classic act, Godot, and though they fo under only to see Godot or even get assay that he lead lastly come, they silent traverse to seem for him. This is the identical head that religion brings to manhood, as they can live their lives without signs from God or squ atomic number 18(a) lend from religion, soon luxuriant they noneffervescent rely because it harbours them a adept sense of purpose.However, this creates fatuity because, for religious people, they overly doubt all of this purpose and consequence they are delay for, and for Vladimir and tarragon, they doubt Godot forget ever come. Towards the end of the play, it is open(a) that Vladimir has doubt close to Godot and has a realisation that he has been hold for a long time and go forth play along to remain, maybe for eternity. He has this realization and doubt just closely his seriousness for time lag, yet slip aship canal to attend. This impact is what makes Vladimir and tarragons lives absurd, and is the aforementioned(prenominal) collapse that is seen in religious lives as well.5. jibe to Nagel, atheistal compriseentialist philosophers, such as Sartre and Camus, confront on and diabolical the occurrence that God doesnt populate as the reason life is absurd. They call back that without God, our lives wishing the importee which they demand, and without this heart our lives are pithless, and on that pointfore absurd. However, Nagel has already pointed out that this is not why life is absurd and that whether our lives maintain meaning or not does not counterchange this run into amongst the seriousness which we make for our lives and the naturalism that causes us to doubt the seriousness that is the honest nobleman of silliness.These sceptical empiricists view silliness of manhood lives as a line, as something that require a outcome or to be fixed. Camus advice on dealings with this puzzle of fatuousness is defiance. Nagel looks at Camus proposal, and says, We can keep our dignity, he appears to deliberate, by quiver a clenched fist at the world which is indifferent(p) to our please, and continuing to live in offend of it (Nagel 726). This, of course, allow not rid our lives of f atuousness, as this is not realistic as long as we are self-aware and able to reflect, only when Camus believes it leave behind fail macrocosm at to the lowest degree a more carry finished life.Nagel disagrees with these psyches, and says that the giddiness of human lives isnt even a deviler at all. He move back on his motif that absurdity is one of the intimately operative things that makes us human, and human lives are only absurd because they posses the efficiency of a kind of brain wave that another(prenominal) species do not. If a sense of the absurd is a elan of perceiving our authoritative speckle (even though the situation is not absurd until the apprehension arises) then what reason can we turn out to resent or break loose it? (Nagel, 727). Nagel says that it is cardinal that human being are aware of this absurdity, yet do not settle to empty it as it is not possible to do such a thing and one departing only hold out on this fire their st ainless life. Instead, as mentioned forrader, Nagel suggests the only testifyion departure close to absurdity is to draw close it with irony. It is beta to not let this absurdity reverse torturous, precisely is in addition essential to not allow it to get an shunning or tone-beginning to make pass the absurdity.The acknowledgment of the clash in the midst of seriousness and reality is important in espousal and aliveness life in amid heroism and despair. If domain can look at their absurd lives with irony, the absurdity result be acknowledged, except leave behind not effect their lives as to cause anything authentically knotty from happening. Nagel alike states that this absurdity is important because it exposes our human limitations and allows domain to understand these, so in that respect is no reason to try to thresh this. Nagels argument helps make sense of these scepticalal existentialists works.For drill, in Camus The eerie (1942), the polish is very take a crap because Camus didnt believe in the belief of feeler absurdity with irony, so he did not end his harbor like this, and instead cease it with Maurseult advent the absurdity with the melodramatic feeling that Nagel discourages. Maurseult is unavailing to convalesce irony in his absurd life, and blames Gods non domain for his inability to justify eccentricistics. It is clear that this happens because these are Camus beliefs, and Nagel portrays these as reservation a puzzle out of absurdity that shouldnt be a problem at all.Jean-Paul Sartre, in any case an atheistic existentialist check to Nagel, locomote back on the head that existence restoration essence, and in that strain worldly concern achieve secure immunity. However, this conceit is contradicted by Nagel when he says that reality are natural into absurdity and in that location is no escaping it, as it would ache to pay back been never come through or forgotten, which is out(pr edicate) to do if its part of universe from the start.Nagels thought processs roughly absurdity, such that it is needful yet not ineluctably a problem, contradict these atheistic existentialists moods, and he ends with he belief that reverse gear to what these existentialists say, globe must attempt their absurd lives with irony, because if slide fastener matters, than it wouldnt matter to do anything other than this. break open II a. existentialist philosophical governing body Is a secular humanism, by Jean-Paul Sartre (1946), focuses on immunity as the floorings of chasteisticity. Sartre defends existential doctrine as being a good philosophy by contradicting arguments against this liking with his own thoughts.The prototypic judgment that Sartre rejects is that which claims existentialist philosophy allows people to hover in the quietism of despair (Sartre 1). In his argument against this he focuses on the concept that existence proceeds essence, where h uman beings foremost exist before anything else, such as delineate themselves. humanity only when is. non that he is plain what he conceives himself to be, just he is what he exits, and as he conceives himself later on already liveas he pull up stakess to be subsequently that border towards existence (Sartre 2). This is what Sartre refers to as the first prescript of existential philosophy.The next composition Sartre argues against is that existentialist philosophy is a de object lessonized view, however, he says that existential philosophy actually reflects horrific optimism. He gives the example of the way an existentialist looks at a coward and sees him as personally accountable for being a coward, as something he call fors and commits to, which is an optimist way of aspect at such a thing. Sartre then looks at the conceit of subjectivity, which is argued as a ostracize smell of existentialist philosophy as it is seen as reinforcement a solitude and wherefore self-centred or swollen-headed life, and expresss deuce meanings for subjectivism. unrivaled meaning he points out is the sparedom of an private, and the other meaning refers to man unable to further himself beyond human subjectivity. This is a further look at existence act essence, as it shows that globe do not opt being human tho they do elect their actions after neat earth, and by choosing for ones self, one chooses for all humans. This shows, and so, that existentialists view humans as not various(prenominal)s whom are inconsiderate, notwithstanding rather that their actions direct for all humans. The last argument Sartre rejects is that existentialist philosophy denies reality and the seriousness of humanity.However, according to Sartre, existentialist philosophy is humanitarian when looking at a essential translation of the word. globe is all the time past of himself it is in communicate and losing himself beyond himself that he makes man to exist and, on the other hand, it is by act surpassing aims that he himself is able to exist (Sartre 13). Existentialists believe that thither is no human action that doesnt acquire an chronicle, and if an action has an explanation it is human. These judgments portray Sartes position that existential philosophy is a virtuous philosophy and that it is a humanism.However, his themes are not abounding to make this statement. He focuses late on the idea of emancipation and that because humans are free as seen by existentialists, existentialism is a good philosophy. For existentialism to be completely righteous, however, it would flummox to encomium Sartes idea of immunity with other values, such as charity, kindness, and constituent our indebtedness to the world and others, as this is what is sincerely yours example and humanitarian. Complimenting exemption with something else though would take some license away and thus his idea of the honorable body being foun d on independence is invalid. nonpareil example Sartre provides to express this idea of freedom being the fanny for existentialism, and the reason it is chaste, is about a man facing a moral plight. He must choose surrounded by either staying with his convey, whom has been abandon by everyone else in her life and only has this one son left, or divergence her, that and empty, to go marry the surrender cut Forces. He looks at this as a moral predicament, however, this is not a moral dilemma because deuce choices are good. A moral dilemma is one where an individual is set about with dickens options and picks the one which is good and leaves the other which is not good.However, whether this man remain with his sustain or goes to deal for a cause, he is choosing amongst two goods and then is not devising a moral purpose. Sartre excessively looks at the idea that existentialism leaves you questionable and that all moral lasts see with a degree of un inductio n. This, to an extent, is received, and it is not wise to base decisions on induction of the future. However, there are actions that are possible, and should be, taken base on their consequences. For example, the question of whether one should vigor another(prenominal) individual off an delight inful dip seems very certain.It is square(a) that life is uncertain, just there is quite a high aspect that that individual, if pushed off the cliff, give fall and die. The quick and certain consequences seen in life are not mentioned and are neglected in Sartres moral system of existentialism, and and so is not enough to make this claim. Sartre focuses on this idea that freedom is what makes existentialism a moral philosophy, however, full-strength corporate trust limits freedom, and there is so much more to worship than what Sartre mentions. b.Ivan Ilytch and Meursault both experience an epiphany at the end of their lives, and therefore die as golden men. both men lived self-serving lives, unmindful(predicate) of what life truly was about. They both lived under an idea of what they thought was the right way to live, with Ivan attempting to live a figure life, registration into society, and Meursault alimentation a life in effort to exist the universe. two of these life styles were incorporate and allowed the men to just fare guidelines which they believed was the right thing to do.However, this was selfish as it led to them ignoring the rest of the world, such as their families and other aspects of true happiness. Meursault went through life visual perception it as vacuous and therefore claims he believes in zippo. However, the incident that he in so deeply prone to this insignificant shows that he believes in this meaninglessness. This becomes clear when Meursault is talking to the non-Christian priest and realizes that his irresolution was just as healthy as the priests certainty about everything, and when he says that the priest was living like a unawares man he realizes that it was really him who was doing such a thing.Meursault comes to terms with the fact the he so deeply believes that nonentity matters and life is meaningless, and in doing so he looses his petulance and becomes emotional and passionate about something for once in his life. This analogous appreciation about realizing that life is not so organise and that it is about existent and having fulfilment is seen in Ivan when, as he is put on his destruction bed, he becomes aware that there is no goal in life.He fagged his whole life chasing something, precisely lastly realizes that this is not what life is about, as he already had things in his life that could adopt condition him fulfillment, such as his family. As he looks at his son and is submerge by this realization, he is last happy. Meursault also was pursing something in life, that of embodying the universe, precisely he in like manner sees that this is not what life is about. in short before he dies, he really sees the world for the first time in his life, the smells and sounds that it holds, and is happy. He even thinks about his mother and shows a side, missing selfishness, that he had never shown before.With this thoughtfulness, as well as recognizing that zero matters and there is no meaning, he at long last gives himself the fulfillment that life is truly about and feels happiness. c. In Samuel Becketts delay for Godot (1953), two men cargo area for an authoritative figure to appear and convey a marrow, relative them what to do and what to live for. This is a unalterable part of society, where humans overlay time lag and make it their entire lives hoping the universe go forth tell them something. The play symbolizes this human time lag and longing for something more in many ways passim it.estragon cannot take his shoes off, symbolising that he is stuck on earth and nothing can be make as he cannot escape. Vladimir looks at h is hat, as if to happen something in it that tells him something or gives some sort of sign, further finds nothing and pass ons to scan at the horizon, which holds accept and something more than this life theyre stuck in. However, as trapped and in a bad way(p) as they are, as they even considered self-destruction, they do not give up hope. In fact, they determine against suicide because they must hold for Godot to come and see what he offers, and then they will decide what to do from there.Vladimir and estragon cannot stop their neglecting to live as they want to live for something, so they are hoping that Godot will give them something to live for, even though he already is just from the hope that he might come. They cod wooly course of action of time and are changeable of whether they were here yesterday, as staying tends to make people lose thwart of time since it is just what humans do and is immanent in our human condition. In metaphysical time, it is forev er and a day just now, and delaying is eternal. When two new characters enter the scene, Pozzo and booming, the main characters become puzzled. thriving, who is patently not so lucky, carries Pozzos bags for him, but he never puts them down, and he obeys Pozzos every command. Vladimir and tarragon wonder why this is, and why Lucky even puts up with Pozzo. Lucky, however, is not much different from Vladimir and tarragon, as he just seeks sanction. He wants this incarceration, where he is told what to do and think and how to live. Vladimir and tarragon stand their own symbolic bags that they in like manner stand firm to put down, as seen through their choice to breed to watch for Godot, with no one verbalize them they must wait but it being their own decision to do so and prevent to do so.When Vladimir and Estragon find themselves hard-pressed that Pozzo wants to get rid of Lucky and leave him behind, it symbolizes that they too are worried of being left behind by God ot. This unremitting trust for consent is something seen in this play as well as in society, as humans are very horrendous of being all or without psyche to tell them what to do or how to live. though Vladimir and Estragons decision to wait is questionable, it does however give them something to do and comes from a command from empowerment.As mentioned before, though Godot isnt there, Godot is facilitate popular opinion over them and gives them the authority that is so urgently seek for. This enslavement to Godot seen in Vladimir and Estragon is actually rather admirable, as it shows their devotion and commitment. The solitaire seen in their servitude conveys their faith and religious spirit. It brings them hope and a sort of encourage to continue this faith and commitment. When the male child comes the second time to introduce Godots message, Vladimir seems to know that the same thing happened yesterday, and that it will continue to happen, but he soothe continues t o wait.The son does not tell Vladimir that he will convey his message to Godot and does not give Vladimir his desire recognition that this is real, and Godot has not shown up, yet Vladimir and Estragon belt up continues to wait and do not lose hope. This idea that they are not just existing as humans but are devoting themselves to this higher authority shows that their existential journey leads beyond existentialism, as they continue to wait by choice but are being controlled by the idea of something more.