Increase and Decrease in Social Capital Essay

The definition of well-disposed great is easiest to narrow when looking at both quarrel separately. Essenti exclusivelyy, the capital is the breadth, number and posterior advantages of hearty bonds. As sociologist John field puts it, Its central thesis provide be summed up in two words altogetheriances matter. (Field, J (2008). neighborly uppercase. 2nd ed. New York Routledge. 1). These relationships whitethorn manifest themselves in numerous cordial contexts, such as in work, family, academic endeavors and so on. Regardless of context, the benefits that Fielding alludes to, and what really matters, ar the accumulative efforts of mixer groups and the advantages they hold over somebody labour. cordial capital is especially applicable to our online social networks, and this essay entrust be analysing cases that support or reject the story The internet has been cogitate both to increases and reduces in social capital (Ellison & Steinfield, 2007).Despite existing since the 1960s, the take aim of integration deep down society that the net maintains now has only been achieved within the live decade. The flourish of social networking sites that make the net profit such a pivotal tool in our interactions with wizard anformer(a) began around the operate of the millennia. Since the inception of sites like MySpace in 2003, the concept of a weathervanesite where substance abusers may presentation their details and interact with one a nonher has been capitalised on. These networks, often establishing themselves in the contour line of blogs paved the way to what atomic number 18 now fast becoming our online identities. The egression of Facebook is exemplary of how online interaction has grown into a social institute. Created in 2004, by 2007 Facebook was reported to guard more than 21 billion registered member generating 1.6 one thousand million page stacks each day (Needham & Company, 2007). It is clear from Facebooks purpose that the ave nues of social capital are fortified and strengthened by online social networks. The general use of Facebook has revolutionised many aspects of social interaction.Event organization for example, is now roughly reliant on Facebook for its success. Facebooks usage has reached such oftenness from the population that it is now an eligible and required source of investigation for crime.The confirmatoryly charged effects from this are outlined in the statement brotherly chief city has been linked to a variety of positive social conclusions, such as better public health, lower crime rates, and more efficient pecuniary markets (Adler & Kwon, 2002). At its core, Facebook exists to support networks of friends (initially college students), and in this sense it move ons social capital by enabling distance-independent communication. Despite these obvious virtues of Facebook however, there is some opposition to the thinking that it promotes social capital. Donath and Boyd (2004) argue that social network websites do not promote social capital and societal bonds. Instead, they merely concur weak, superficial bonds ascribable to the ease and facile nature of online interactions.Examples of this are liking friends photos, liking status and playing games with other Facebook friends. Bargh and McKenna (2004) argues that Internet use distracts from face-to-face time with others, which might diminish an soulfulnesss social capital. However, it appears this thesis received criticism from Wellman, Haase and Witte who believe that online interactions may supplement or replace in-person interactions, mitigating any loss from the time spent online. These statements enounce information on the rocketing popularity of social networking and how it has become the first choice of communication. some other factor to consider is online obtain. EBay is an online auction website where users endure bid on items that other users are selling, users can turn over each other abou t the product they are bidding/buying, this is considered a weak connection.EBay has over 14 million active users has is increasingly growing, one would consider that this increases their social capital, an arguments to support this statement is that EBay is a professional business and has rules and regulations to follow if you are a user, these guidelines likewise state that you should come to the intellectual property owner with any questions to begin with listing which encourages and promotes contacting another seller before, during and after you suck in purchased their product. Harrison (1998) suggested that it is possible to ground social capital in the short term and that this is withal cognize as capacity building EBay stems relationships on the Internet by having your favoured users option, this helps you to revisit any company or professional individual you liked shopping with and gives you the opportunity to view other items they have for sale which would increase ones individual social capital. However,Kotha et. Al. (2004), denies this and leads on to say customer and relationship services provide a militant edge for ecommerce traders.These two communicatory factors were found to be more beneficial in creating a broad term competitive edge than web site usability and product selection, which may provide short term gain yet will not create social capital with the user or give them an unrestrained connection with the brand or product (Kotha, S., Rajgopal, S., Venkatachalam, M., (2004) The role of online buying insure as a competitive advantage evidence from Third company ratings for ecommerce firms, The Journal of Business, 77) It has similarly become clear when researching genial metropolis that masses argue that you cannot measure the increase in affectionate Capital, it has been argued that without measurement, change cannot be determined (Suna, B. (2011). Building affectionate Capital. http//www.socialcapitalresearch.com/buildin g.html.). Also, according to Putnam (1993), social capital is more often than not determined by historical factors it can thus not be enhanced in the short term. Putnams view is also fully supported by Schmidt (2000) and Uslaner and Dekker (2001). They considered social capital as a by-product of other social activities. This intends that websites such as EBay decrease social capital because there is only a short amount of contact with other citizenry.To support this, EBays purpose is for buying, selling and bidding. Once a user has bought a product, the probability that they will never get in contact with that user again is very high due to no face-to-face interaction, which makes it hard to build a relationship for some people. The outcome of this is not being able to maintain or create a strong bond between the two, thus decreasing Social Capital. The last factor to consider is News on the Internet. Having news show on the Internet is a great way to increase Social Capital. Norris, (2001) argued that the hope that the Internet would be especially useful in encouraging many people to join political discussions has not been realized. Norris debates that the Internet is has allowed readers to comment on articles and even start discussions about the article they are reading, but not everyone takes advantage of this option. Discussions help build bonds within people who post comments because they are either supporting or arguing about the information at hand.This does not necessarily mean they are building strong bonds, but a connection is madebetween many people that could not happen before the News was posted on the Internet. A pursuit purport is that the Internet is always accessible. Modern mobile phones now all have access to the Internet, therefore there is nothing stopping individuals obtaining the news. ingeniousphones have taken this one step further and created an application to access the news for free. Applications make it simpler for individ uals to read the news, email articles to friends and express their opinion with the comment option. Smart phones have given individuals the access to enjoy news wherever they are. During these advanced(a) times, Law enforcements have taken to updating the news via social networks. modify social networks spread to a wider audience of readers, keeps readers aware of what is happening in the news and gives the opportunity for individuals to conduct questions and in some cases help. This helps increase Social Capital, serious and local news can be discussed between readers and in some cases solve problems. For example, injecting the media sources with information of a missing person spreads the exculpation and creates more wide spread enforcements, which is shown in the following statement . resultant researchers (Best & Dautrich, 2003 Kavanaugh, Reese, Carroll, & Rosson, 2005 Kobayashi, Ikeda, & Miyata, 2006 Rsnen & Kouvo, 2007) found that online communications have a positive effe ct on individuals social trust and participation in union life (Valenzuela, S., Park, N. and Kee, K. F. (2009), Is There Social Capital in a Social Network Site? Facebook Use and College Students Life Satisfaction, Trust, and Participation Journal of Computer-Mediated conference) Overall, all these factors help increase social capital, because they are creating strong bonds between dissimilar people, most of who wasnt aware of others existence.Alternatively, News on the Internet can also decrease social capital. This is because there is again, no face-to-face interaction with other people, therefore making it hard to build relationships and bonds. Discussions can also lead to arguments on the Internet, the lack of face-to-face interaction gives some readers the self-reliance to vocalise opinions they would not necessarily vocalise when in physical contact with someone. The Internet for a lot of individuals is seen as a shield of protection, and a small percentage of people can v oice hateful words on the Internet and no action can be taken. This decreases an individuals Social Capital, because people would not want to create bondswith others with view on the Internet. In conclusion, the Internet has been linked to both increase and decrease Social Capital in numerous ways.Social Networking has increased Social Capital by creating bonds between individuals with a variety of positive social aspects, maintaining old friendships and whilst enabling new ones. However, Social Networking also decreases Social Capital due to the lack of face-to-face interaction, and it is also argued that Social Networks merely sustain weak, superficial bonds due to the ease and facile nature of online interactions (Donath and Boyd, 2004). Online shopping platforms have also increased Social Capital, EBay forces users to contact each other to ask about products they are selling, users bid/buy products and are sometimes in competition with other users to win the item.This creates bo nds between users even though they are weak. The decrease of Social Capital on EBay is the point of no face-to-face interaction, and after the transition is completed, there is no need for you to contact that user again, so this is an example of short term Social Capital. The last point discussed was News on the Internet, the increase of Social Capital in the news is the point of everyone being able to comment or discuss news stories. Alternatively, the decreasing affect of the news on the Internet is also an invitation for arguments and bad opinions.ReferencesEllison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook friends Social Capital and college students use of social networking sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated parley, 12(4), article 1.(2005). What is Social Capital and how might it be used in Scotlands schools? ready(prenominal) http//www.ces.ed.ac.uk/PDF%20Files/Brief036.pdf.).(Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007) The benefits of Facebo ok friends Social Capital and college students use of online social network sites).Donath, J., & Boyd, D. (2004). Public displays of connection. BT engineering Journal, 22(4), 7182.Kotha, S., Rajgopal, S., Venkatachalam, M., (2004) The role of online buying experience as a competitive advantage evidence from ThirdParty ratings for ecommerce firms, The Journal of Business, 77(S2), pp. 109-13.Dekker, P & Uslaner, E (2001). Social Capital and Participation in Everyday Life. London & New York Routledge.Kilpatrick, S. Falk, I. Harrison, L (1998). skill in rural communities a rapid economic change. Australia Centre of inquiry and Learning in Regional AustraliaBest, S., & Dautrich, K. (2003). Reinvigorating democracy Generating social capital and political participation on the Internet. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Nashville, TN.Kavanaugh, A., Reese, D., Carroll, J., & Rosson, M. (2005). Weak ties in networked communities. Information Society, 21, 119131.Kobayashi, T., Ikeda, K. i., & Miyata, K. (2006). Social capital online Collective use of the Internet and reciprocity as lubricants of democracy. Information, Communication & Society, 9, 582611.Rsnen, P., & Kouvo, A. (2007). Linked or divided by the web Internet use and sociability in four European countries Communication & Society, 10, 219241.Websiteshttp//pages.ebay.co.uk/aboutebay/thecompany/companyoverview.html